R&j Holding Co v. The Redevelopment Authority Of

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in R&j Holding Co v. The Redevelopment Authority Of. Read the opinion of the Court — 670 F.3d 420
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 15, 2011·No. 10-1047·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________

No. 10-1047 _____________

R&J HOLDING COMPANY; RJ FLORIG INDUSTRIAL COMPANY, INC.,

Appellants

v.

THE REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY; DONALD W. PULVER; GREATER CONSHOHOCKEN IMPROVEMENT CORP.; TBFA PARTNERS, L.P. _________________

Before: SLOVITER, SMITH, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

_________________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION _________________

It is hereby ORDERED that the Precedential Majority Opinion filed on December

9, 2011, is hereby AMENDED as follows: The section designation of “III.D.” on page

29 is amended to “III. E”.

By the Court,

/s/ D. Brooks Smith U.S. Circuit Judge

Date: December 15, 2011

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R&j Holding Co v. The Redevelopment Authority Of, (3d Cir. 2011).

R&j Holding Co v. The Redevelopment Authority Of (R&j Holding Co v. The Redevelopment Authority Of) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.