Rizzuto v. Getty Petroleum Corp.

289 A.D.2d 217, 736 N.Y.S.2d 233, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11747
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 3, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 289 A.D.2d 217 (Rizzuto v. Getty Petroleum Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rizzuto v. Getty Petroleum Corp., 289 A.D.2d 217, 736 N.Y.S.2d 233, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for the discharge of petroleum in violation of Navigation Law article 12, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated December 4, 2000, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against them in the principal sum of $509,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

An underground petroleum storage tank owned by the appellants leaked onto the respondents’ properties. The appellants admitted to liability, and the respondents were awarded damages in the principal sum of $509,000 for the diminution in value of their properties.

Contrary to the appellants’ contention, the damages awarded to the respondents did not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see, CPLR 5501 [c]). Furthermore, [218]*218although certain appraisal reports were hearsay and, therefore, improperly admitted into evidence, the error was harmless since we are satisfied that the result would have been the same if the appraisal reports had not been admitted (see, Barracato v Camp Bauman Buses, 217 AD2d 677).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Friedmann, J. P., Smith, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dirschberger v. Lawson
2020 NY Slip Op 05358 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Andrew Carothers, M.D., P.C. v. Progressive Insurance Co.
2017 NY Slip Op 2614 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Parris v. New York City Transit Authority
140 A.D.3d 938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Cicalo v. Long Island Rail Road
134 A.D.3d 1064 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Williams v. New York City Transit Authority
121 A.D.3d 780 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Andrew Carothers, M.D., P.C. v. Progressive Insurance
42 Misc. 3d 30 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
DAVIS, RENAULD v. VALLIE, ESTELLE
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
Davis v. Vallie
93 A.D.3d 1232 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Ewanciw v. Atlas
65 A.D.3d 1077 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Calix v. New York City Transit Authority
14 A.D.3d 583 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Sanchez v. City of New York
299 A.D.2d 475 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
289 A.D.2d 217, 736 N.Y.S.2d 233, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rizzuto-v-getty-petroleum-corp-nyappdiv-2001.