Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rizzotto v. State

Rizzotto v. State

938 So. 2d 619, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16429, 2006 WL 2818772
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 4, 2006
DocketNo. 4D05-4786
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 938 So. 2d 619 (Rizzotto v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rizzotto v. State, 938 So. 2d 619, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16429, 2006 WL 2818772 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, but remand the case to the trial court with directions to enter a corrected order of revocation of probation. The order provided correctly states that appellant was found to have violated condition 11; however, condition 11 was that appellant have no contact with her father at his residence. The order provided states that appellant violated condition 11 by changing her residence without first procuring the consent of her probation officer.

POLEN, FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joseph v. Chanin
938 So. 2d 619 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
938 So. 2d 619, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16429, 2006 WL 2818772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rizzotto-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.