Rizzotto v. State
938 So. 2d 619, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16429, 2006 WL 2818772
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 4, 2006·No. No. 4D05-4786·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm, but remand the case to the trial court with directions to enter a corrected order of revocation of probation. The order provided correctly states that appellant was found to have violated condition 11; however, condition 11 was that appellant have no contact with her father at his residence. The order provided states that appellant violated condition 11 by changing her residence without first procuring the consent of her probation officer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rizzotto v. State, 938 So. 2d 619, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16429, 2006 WL 2818772 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
938 So. 2d 619 (Rizzotto v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Joseph v. Chanin
938 So. 2d 619 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)