Rizzoro v. Rizzoro
This text of 260 A.D. 881 (Rizzoro v. Rizzoro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying appellant’s motion for leave to intervene in a matrimonial action, to vacate a final judgment of divorce entered nunc pro tunc, and for further relief affirmed, with one bill of ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondents. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs upon the ground that the appellant has no standing in the action, but is of the opinion, however, that the Special Term had no power to direct the entry of judgment nunc pro tunc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 A.D. 881, 23 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rizzoro-v-rizzoro-nyappdiv-1940.