Rizzoro v. Rizzoro
260 A.D. 881, 23 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5206
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 21, 1940·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Order denying appellant’s motion for leave to intervene in a matrimonial action, to vacate a final judgment of divorce entered nunc pro tunc, and for further relief affirmed, with one bill of ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondents. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs upon the ground that the appellant has no standing in the action, but is of the opinion, however, that the Special Term had no power to direct the entry of judgment nunc pro tunc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rizzoro v. Rizzoro, 260 A.D. 881, 23 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5206 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).
260 A.D. 881 (Rizzoro v. Rizzoro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cornell v. Cornell
164 N.E.2d 395 (New York Court of Appeals, 1959)
Johnson v. Johnson
277 A.D.2d 1143 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)
Johnson v. Johnson
198 Misc. 691 (New York Supreme Court, 1950)