Rizzo v. Torchiano

57 A.D.3d 872, 868 N.Y.2d 926

This text of 57 A.D.3d 872 (Rizzo v. Torchiano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rizzo v. Torchiano, 57 A.D.3d 872, 868 N.Y.2d 926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

The defendant failed to make a prima facie showing that the plaintiff John M. Rizzo did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Staubitz v Yaser, 41 AD3d 698 [2007]; O’Neal v Bronopolsky, 41 AD3d 452 [2007]; Hughes v Cai, 31 AD3d 385 [2006]). Accordingly, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly denied without the need to consider the sufficiency of the plaintiffs’ opposition papers. Fisher, J.E, Covello, Balkin and Belen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hughes v. Cai
31 A.D.3d 385 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
O'Neal v. Bronopolsky
41 A.D.3d 452 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Staubitz v. Yaser
41 A.D.3d 698 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.D.3d 872, 868 N.Y.2d 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rizzo-v-torchiano-nyappdiv-2008.