Rizzo v. Groeber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rizzo v. Groeber

29 A.D.2d 987, 289 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4210

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 22, 1968·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 10, 1967, reversed, without costs, and preference vacated, without prejudice to a further application for a preference, if plaintiffs be so advised. The grant of a preference in trial must be vacated in the absence of a stenographic transcript of the pretrial hearing or other appropriate record showing a factual basis therefor (Jones V. Otis Elevator Co., 24 A D 2d 451; Abramson v. Kenwood Labs., 17 A D 2d 626, 627). Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 10, 1967, reversed, without costs, and preference vacated, without prejudice to a further application for a preference, if plaintiffs be so advised. The grant of a preference in trial must be vacated in the absence of a stenographic transcript of the pretrial hearing or other appropriate record showing a factual basis therefor (Jones V. Otis Elevator Co., 24 A D 2d 451; Abramson v. Kenwood Labs., 17 A D 2d 626, 627). Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Rizzo v. Groeber, 29 A.D.2d 987, 289 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4210 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

29 A.D.2d 987 (Rizzo v. Groeber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related