Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Rizzo v. City of New York

Rizzo v. City of New York

9 Misc. 3d 91
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided September 22, 2005·Published

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Judgment entered on or about June 19, 2003 reversed, without costs, and the action is dismissed.

[92] The plaintiff, a former New York City employee, is suing for one week’s “deferred” salary under an alleged agreement entered into between his union and the City of New York.

The plaintiff may not sue the City of New York directly but must proceed to arbitration under the collective bargaining agreement between his union and the City of New York (Albert v City of New York, 103 Misc 2d 962 [App Term, 1st Dept 1980]; Deneen v City of New York, 113 Misc 2d 523 [App Term, 1st Dept 1982]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rizzo v. City of New York, 9 Misc. 3d 91 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

9 Misc. 3d 91 (Rizzo v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Albert v. City of New York
103 Misc. 2d 962 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Deneen v. City of New York
113 Misc. 2d 523 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)