Rizzo v. City of New York

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Rizzo v. City of New York

9 Misc. 3d 91

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedSeptember 22, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Misc. 3d 91 (Rizzo v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rizzo v. City of New York, 9 Misc. 3d 91 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Judgment entered on or about June 19, 2003 reversed, without costs, and the action is dismissed.

[92]*92The plaintiff, a former New York City employee, is suing for one week’s “deferred” salary under an alleged agreement entered into between his union and the City of New York.

The plaintiff may not sue the City of New York directly but must proceed to arbitration under the collective bargaining agreement between his union and the City of New York (Albert v City of New York, 103 Misc 2d 962 [App Term, 1st Dept 1980]; Deneen v City of New York, 113 Misc 2d 523 [App Term, 1st Dept 1982]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI