Rizo v. Yovino
869 F.3d 1004, 2017 WL 3720748, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 16561
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 29, 2017·No. No. 16-15372·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rizo v. Yovino, 869 F.3d 1004, 2017 WL 3720748, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 16561 (9th Cir. 2017).
869 F.3d 1004 (Rizo v. Yovino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Aileen Rizo v. Jim Yovino
950 F.3d 1217 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)