Home/Ninth Circuit/Rizo v. Yovino

Rizo v. Yovino

869 F.3d 1004, 2017 WL 3720748, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 16561
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 29, 2017
DocketNo. 16-15372
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 869 F.3d 1004 (Rizo v. Yovino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rizo v. Yovino, 869 F.3d 1004, 2017 WL 3720748, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 16561 (9th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aileen Rizo v. Jim Yovino
950 F.3d 1217 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
869 F.3d 1004, 2017 WL 3720748, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 16561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rizo-v-yovino-ca9-2017.