Rizk v. United States

77 Ct. Cl. 592, 1933 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 284, 1933 WL 1799
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedMay 8, 1933
DocketNo. M-136
StatusPublished

This text of 77 Ct. Cl. 592 (Rizk v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rizk v. United States, 77 Ct. Cl. 592, 1933 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 284, 1933 WL 1799 (cc 1933).

Opinion

Williams, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

Under the uniform decisions of this court in many cases, too numerous for citation here, the dependency of plaintiff’s mother on him for her chief support, within the meaning of section 4 of the act of June 10, 1922, 42 Stat. 625, 627, is clearly established.

The plaintiff is therefore entitled to recover the increased rental and subsistence allowances of an officer of the Navy of his rank, from June 21, 1929, to January 27, 1932, the date on which the last testimony was taken. The plaintiff’s claim being a continuing one, he is also entitled to recover like allowances to the date of entry of judgment herein, upon the filing of supplementary evidence supporting such dependency to that date.

[594]*594The entry of judgment will await the coming in of a report from the Comptroller General showing the amount due plaintiff in accordance with this opinion.

Whaley, Judge; Littleton, Judge; and GeeeN, Judge, concur. Booth, Chief Justice, did not hear this case, on account of illness, and took no part in its decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 Ct. Cl. 592, 1933 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 284, 1933 WL 1799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rizk-v-united-states-cc-1933.