Rixey ex rel. Rixey v. Cox

Supreme Court

Rixey ex rel. Rixey v. Cox

235 U.S. 687, 35 S. Ct. 204

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 2, 1914·No. No. 26·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of juris- • diction upon the authority of. (1) Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 [688]*688U. S. 89, 100; David Kaufman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; Cassidy v. Colorado, 223 U. S. 707; (2) In re Converse, 137 U. S. 624, 632; Compagnie Francaise &c. v. Board of Health, 186 U. S. 380, 393; Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11, 25-27.

Mr. John L. Jeffries and Mr. Jas. B. Catón for the appellant. Mr. J. Garland Pollard and Mr. Christopher B. Garnett for the appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of juris- • diction upon the authority of. (1) Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 [688]*688U. S. 89, 100; David Kaufman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; Cassidy v. Colorado, 223 U. S. 707; (2) In re Converse, 137 U. S. 624, 632; Compagnie Francaise &c. v. Board of Health, 186 U. S. 380, 393; Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11, 25-27.

Mr. John L. Jeffries and Mr. Jas. B. Catón for the appellant. Mr. J. Garland Pollard and Mr. Christopher B. Garnett for the appellee.

Rixey ex rel. Rixey v. Cox, 235 U.S. 687, 35 S. Ct. 204 (1914).

Pincite

235 U.S. 687 (Rixey ex rel. Rixey v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related