Rixey ex rel. Rixey v. Cox

Supreme Court

Rixey ex rel. Rixey v. Cox

235 U.S. 687, 35 S. Ct. 204

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 2, 1914

DocketNo. 26

StatusPublished

This text of 235 U.S. 687 (Rixey ex rel. Rixey v. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rixey ex rel. Rixey v. Cox, 235 U.S. 687, 35 S. Ct. 204 (1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of juris- • diction upon the authority of. (1) Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 [688]*688U. S. 89, 100; David Kaufman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; Cassidy v. Colorado, 223 U. S. 707; (2) In re Converse, 137 U. S. 624, 632; Compagnie Francaise &c. v. Board of Health, 186 U. S. 380, 393; Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11, 25-27.

Mr. John L. Jeffries and Mr. Jas. B. Catón for the appellant. Mr. J. Garland Pollard and Mr. Christopher B. Garnett for the appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of juris- • diction upon the authority of. (1) Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 [688]*688U. S. 89, 100; David Kaufman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; Cassidy v. Colorado, 223 U. S. 707; (2) In re Converse, 137 U. S. 624, 632; Compagnie Francaise &c. v. Board of Health, 186 U. S. 380, 393; Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11, 25-27.

Mr. John L. Jeffries and Mr. Jas. B. Catón for the appellant. Mr. J. Garland Pollard and Mr. Christopher B. Garnett for the appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 U.S. 687, 35 S. Ct. 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rixey-ex-rel-rixey-v-cox-scotus-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack