Rivkin v. Hertz Driv-Ur-Self Stations
237 A.D. 842
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1932
StatusPublished
This text of 237 A.D. 842 (Rivkin v. Hertz Driv-Ur-Self Stations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rivkin v. Hertz Driv-Ur-Self Stations, 237 A.D. 842 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. The court erred in excluding evidence to prove the plaintiff’s usual income derived from his services as a professional man. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
237 A.D. 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivkin-v-hertz-driv-ur-self-stations-nyappdiv-1932.