Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Rivisto v. New York Telephone Co.

Rivisto v. New York Telephone Co.

148 Misc. 864, 265 N.Y.S. 844, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1206
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMarch 24, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 148 Misc. 864 (Rivisto v. New York Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rivisto v. New York Telephone Co., 148 Misc. 864, 265 N.Y.S. 844, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1206 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment unanimously reversed upon the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with appropriate costs in the [865]*865court below. Whether the complaint is considered as it was served or as amended, it sought recovery for an amount beyond the jurisdiction of the City Court. The motion made at the opening of the trial to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction should have been granted. (Bremer v. Fox, Appellate Term, 2d Dept., No. 447, March term, 1931; Goldberg v. My-T-Fine Corp., Appellate Term, 2d Dept., No. 386, March term, 1931.)

All concur; present, MacCrate, Lewis and Johnston, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

De Lisa v. Trifoglio Construction Co.
149 Misc. 532 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1933)
Deal v. Zarelli Realty Corp.
148 Misc. 865 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 Misc. 864, 265 N.Y.S. 844, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivisto-v-new-york-telephone-co-nyappterm-1933.