Riviere v. Boissiere
This text of 5 La. 382 (Riviere v. Boissiere) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court, Mathews, J. being absent, was delivered by
This is an action to set aside a sale of a town lot, on the the ground of lesion. The case turns on the fact whether it existed or not. The judge of the court of the first instance, thought the evidence so doubtful, that he could not annul the contract; and he declared, that in cases of this kind, the evidence should be most clear and satisfactory in support of a plaintiff’s pretensions. A perusal of the testi-mon7’ leaves our minds pretty much in the same situation w^h that of the judge of the first instance; and we fully agree with him in thinking that demands of this kind should be supported by strong proof.
It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 La. 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riviere-v-boissiere-la-1833.