Rivette v. Barkers Restaurant, Inc.

238 A.D. 759

This text of 238 A.D. 759 (Rivette v. Barkers Restaurant, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rivette v. Barkers Restaurant, Inc., 238 A.D. 759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Memorandum. The record discloses no change in the condition of the premises after the tenant took possession, but does disclose a condition existing previous to the tenant’s entering which is sufficient to justify the jury’s finding of negligence. In this state of the record the failure of the court to limit the responsibility of the defendant landlord to conditions existing before or at the time when the lease was made (Callings v. Goetz, 256 N. Y. 287) is to be disregarded. All concur. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cullings v. Goetz
176 N.E. 397 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
238 A.D. 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivette-v-barkers-restaurant-inc-nyappdiv-1933.