Riverwood Builders, Inc. v. Bridgton Gen. Store
This text of Riverwood Builders, Inc. v. Bridgton Gen. Store (Riverwood Builders, Inc. v. Bridgton Gen. Store) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF MAINE ~SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss ',. L ',',CIVIL ACTION : ' ~DOCKET NO. RE-09-118
RIVERWOOD BUILDERS, INC., LJ9 i",:T i lj ,\ 11: 3Ll JI Plaintiff ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIDGTON GENERAL STORE, LLC, Defendant
Before the court is Plaintiff Riverwood Builders Inc.' s (Riverwood) Motion
for Summary Judgment. Riverwood alleges that Defendant, Bridgton General
Stores, LLC (BGS), breached its contract and owes Riverwood $25,031 plus
Iitigation costs for services performed at 270 Main Street in Bridgton, Maine.
Summary judgment should be granted if there is no genuine dispute as to
any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. M.R.
Civ. P. 56(c). In considering a motion for summary judgment, the court should
consider the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, dnd the
court is required to consider only the portions of the record referred to and the
material facts set forth in the parties' Rule 56(h) statements. E.g., JOh115011 V.
McNeil, 2002 ME 99, err 8, 800 A.2d 702, 704. A contested fact is "material" if it
could potentially affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law. [71kel v.
Livillfl,st071, 2005 ME 42, 9I 4, 869 A.2d 745, 747. A fact is "genuine" if there is
sufficient evidence supporting the claimed fact to require a fact-finder to choose
behveen competing versions of facts at trial. Id
Genuine issues of material fact exist, precluding the court from granting
this motion. It appears that Riverwood entered into a contract to repair
structural damage to the property in Bridgton, Maine. However, no contract signed by or on behalf of the Defendant has been provided and the court cannot
determine whether the "quote," which was provided was accepted.
Additionally, the court is not able to determine if the work was to be performed
on the residential portion of the property, the commercial portion of the
property, or both.
Additional factual disputes preclude summary judgment: 1) the amount
of work Riverwood performed pursuant to a clause in the underlying "quote,"
which states: "Any additional damage to support structure that becomes evident
upon demolition will be discussed with client and contracted separately;" and 2)
whether the contracting party was aware that Riverwood was performing
additional work at 270 Main Street. Without a fully executed contract and
without further information this court cannot grant Riverwood's Motion for
Summary Judgment.
Therefore, the entry is:
Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.
Dated at Portland, Maine this _-+-/---,V_M __ day of _a_0_~_£'=---'--'-'\_ _-" 2009.
Robert E. Crowley Justice, Superior Court COURTS d COU;lty x 287 l 04112-0287
SAMUEL SHERRY ESQ PO BOX 18201 PORTLAND ME 04101
= COURTS nd County ,ox 287 18 04112-0287
BRIDGTON GENERAL STORE C/O JEAN MCCARTHY 1839 NEW BRITAIN AVE FARMINGTON CT 06032
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Riverwood Builders, Inc. v. Bridgton Gen. Store, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riverwood-builders-inc-v-bridgton-gen-store-mesuperct-2009.