Riverview Apartments Co. v. Golos
468 N.E.2d 297, 62 N.Y.2d 976, 479 N.Y.S.2d 342, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4483
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution and is not the type of nonfinal order which comes within the meaning of CPLR 5602 (subd [a], par 2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Riverview Apartments Co. v. Golos, 468 N.E.2d 297, 62 N.Y.2d 976, 479 N.Y.S.2d 342, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4483 (N.Y. 1984).
468 N.E.2d 297 (Riverview Apartments Co. v. Golos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Nicolaysen v. D'Apice
468 N.E.2d 297 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)