Riverview Apartments Co. v. Golos

468 N.E.2d 297, 62 N.Y.2d 976, 479 N.Y.S.2d 342, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4483
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 29, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 468 N.E.2d 297 (Riverview Apartments Co. v. Golos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Riverview Apartments Co. v. Golos, 468 N.E.2d 297, 62 N.Y.2d 976, 479 N.Y.S.2d 342, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4483 (N.Y. 1984).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution and is not the type of nonfinal order which comes within the meaning of CPLR 5602 (subd [a], par 2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Nicolaysen v. D'Apice
468 N.E.2d 297 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
468 N.E.2d 297, 62 N.Y.2d 976, 479 N.Y.S.2d 342, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riverview-apartments-co-v-golos-ny-1984.