Riverside Trust Co. v. Collin
168 A. 377, 114 N.J. Eq. 157, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 890
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Davis in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Heybteld, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Riverside Trust Co. v. Collin, 168 A. 377, 114 N.J. Eq. 157, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 890 (N.J. 1933).
168 A. 377 (Riverside Trust Co. v. Collin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roberts v. Magnetic Metals Company
611 F.2d 450 (Third Circuit, 1979)
Roberts v. Magnetic Metals Co.
611 F.2d 450 (Third Circuit, 1979)
Yacker v. Weiner
263 A.2d 188 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
MacFadden v. MacFadden
139 A.2d 774 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
Wiley v. Wirbelauer
174 A. 20 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1934)