Riverside Stategic Capital Fund I, LP, RSCF Blocker True Health, LLC, RSCF I-A Blocker True Health, LLC v. CLG Investments, LLC
This text of Riverside Stategic Capital Fund I, LP, RSCF Blocker True Health, LLC, RSCF I-A Blocker True Health, LLC v. CLG Investments, LLC (Riverside Stategic Capital Fund I, LP, RSCF Blocker True Health, LLC, RSCF I-A Blocker True Health, LLC v. CLG Investments, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 15-25-00137-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/7/2026 5:06 PM NO. 15-25-00137-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK FILED IN IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 15th COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTEENTH DISTRICT OF AUSTIN, TEXAS TEXAS AT AUSTIN 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk RIVERSIDE STRATEGIC CAPITAL FUND I, LP, RSCF BLOCKER TRUE HEALTH, LLC, AND RSCF I-A BLOCKER TRUE HEALTH, LLC, Appellants, v. CLG INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL., APPELLEES.
On Appeal from the Business Court of Texas, First Division (1B) Hon. Bill Whitehill, Presiding; Cause No. 25-BC01B- 0006
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF OF APPELLEES
Appellees CLG Investments, LLC, Christopher Grottenthaler, Covert
Investment Operations, LLC, True Health Diagnostic Management, LLC, Richard
Covert, Timothy Tatarowicz, Alba Durata, LLC, Melinda Milburn, Jack Novak,
Dana Hovind, Tom Wippman, Mark Thomas Smith, Alexandra Nettesheim, Kyle
Nettesheim, Robert Osterhoff, RJ Investments, Matt Milburn, Michael Clements,
Michael Osterhoff, Karen Miller, Edward McCann, Daniel Grottenthaler, Anita
Grottenthaler, Christian Richards, Christopher Kling, Kevin Nellis, Carol Nellis,
Bruce Zivian, Ryan Nellis, and Ancelmo E. Lopes (the “Remaining Appellees”),
1 file this unopposed motion for a 31-day extension of time to file their Brief of
Appellees, and respectfully show the Court as follows:
DUE DATE
The current deadline for filing the Brief of Appellees for the Remaining
Appellees is January 9, 2026. No previous extension has been sought by the
Remaining Appellees regarding this brief. The Remaining Appellees seek a 31-
day extension until Monday, February 9, 2026, to file their Brief of Appellees. 1
REASONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Fernando De Leon, LCG Ventures, LLC, LCG Venture II, LCG, and Leon
Capital Partners, LLC (the “LCG Appellees”) previously filed for and received an
extension until February 9, 2026. Counsel for the Remaining Appellees
mistakenly believed the extension applied to all Appellees. Appellants and
Appellees agree that a uniform briefing schedule benefits all parties and would
prefer that all Appellees file a responsive brief on the same date.
Additionally, the Remaining Appellees’ counsel has been involved in other
matters and matters with deadlines quickly approaching. In particular:
• Oral Argument in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on January 8, 2026 in Case Number 25-10572, Ayers v. Neugebauer.
• Responding to a Motion for New Trial on January 4, 2026 in the Cause No. 21-6505-442, Pedestal SVN Investments, LLC v. SVN Med, LLC et al.,
1 The Remaining Appellees seek a 31-day extension because a 30-day extension places the deadline on Sunday, February 8, 2026 2 before the 442nd District Court of Denton County, Texas.
• Preparing for a February 2026 jury trial setting including numerous pretrial filings in Case No. 20-000409-CA, Tower Hill Signature Ins. Co. v. SFR Services, LLC, et al., pending before the 19th Judicial Circuit Court of Martin County, Florida.
• Preparing for a February 2, 2026 jury trial setting in Case No. 23-CF- 000937, State of Florida v. McGraw, pending before the 20th Judicial Circuit Court of Lee County, Florida.
EXTENSION SOUGHT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE
This extension is not sought for the purpose of delay but in the interest of
justice, to allow the Remaining Appellees to fully brief the issues to the Court,
with all parties filing briefs on the same schedule.
APPELLANTS DO NOT OPPOSE THIS MOTION Counsel for Appellants do not oppose this motion for extension of time.
For these reasons, the Remaining Appellees respectfully request that the
Court grant this motion and extend the deadline for filing the Remaining
Appellees’ Brief of Appellees by 31 days, up to and including February 9, 2026.
Dated: January 7, 2026. Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Ryan Downton Ryan Downton THE TEXAS TRIAL GROUP Texas Bar No. 24036500 875 Carr 693, Ste. 103 Dorado, PR 00646 Phone: 512-680-7947 Ryan@TheTexasTrialGroup.com *Ryan Downton is licensed in Texas, not
3 Puerto Rico
ATTORNEYS FOR REMAINING APPELLEES
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
I certify that on January 6, 2025, counsel for Remaining Appellees conferred with Lane Webster, counsel for Appellants, regarding the extension requested herein. Mr. Webster stated that Appellants do not oppose the relief requested in this motion.
/s/ Ryan Downton Ryan Downton
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on January 7, 2026, a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served via e-filing on all counsel of record.
4 Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.
Ryan Downton on behalf of Ryan Downton Bar No. 24036500 ryan@thetexastrialgroup.com Envelope ID: 109784902 Filing Code Description: Motion Filing Description: Motion for Extension of Time Status as of 1/8/2026 7:05 AM CST
Case Contacts
Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status
LaDawn Nandrasy 4715800 ladawn.nandrasy@wickphillips.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT
Sean Lemoine sean.lemoine@wickphillips.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT
Rashella Widdoes - Paralegal widdoes@RoggeDunnGroup.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT
Colin PBenton colin.benton@wickphillips.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT
Lanette Fidone lanette.fidone@wickphillips.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT
Samantha Tandy samantha.tandy@wickphillips.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT
Zachary Farrar Zachary.Farrar@wickphillips.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT
Harvey Joseph Joseph@roggedunngroup.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT
Karina Enriquez karina.enriquez@wickphillips.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT
Lane Webster webster@RoggeDunnGroup.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT
Rogge Dunn dunn@roggedunngroup.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT
Barb Morgan barb.morgan@wickphillips.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT
Associated Case Party: Riverside Strategic Capital Fund I, L.P., RSCF Blocker True Health, LLC, RSCF I-A Blocker True Health, LLC
Adam Gogolak AMGogolak@wlrk.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT
William Savitt WDSavitt@wlrk.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT
Michael Avi-Yonah MSAviYonah@wlrk.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Riverside Stategic Capital Fund I, LP, RSCF Blocker True Health, LLC, RSCF I-A Blocker True Health, LLC v. CLG Investments, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riverside-stategic-capital-fund-i-lp-rscf-blocker-true-health-llc-rscf-texapp-2026.