Riverside Stategic Capital Fund I, LP, RSCF Blocker True Health, LLC, RSCF I-A Blocker True Health, LLC v. CLG Investments, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 7, 2026
Docket15-25-00137-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Riverside Stategic Capital Fund I, LP, RSCF Blocker True Health, LLC, RSCF I-A Blocker True Health, LLC v. CLG Investments, LLC (Riverside Stategic Capital Fund I, LP, RSCF Blocker True Health, LLC, RSCF I-A Blocker True Health, LLC v. CLG Investments, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Riverside Stategic Capital Fund I, LP, RSCF Blocker True Health, LLC, RSCF I-A Blocker True Health, LLC v. CLG Investments, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

ACCEPTED 15-25-00137-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/7/2026 5:06 PM NO. 15-25-00137-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK FILED IN IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 15th COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTEENTH DISTRICT OF AUSTIN, TEXAS TEXAS AT AUSTIN 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk RIVERSIDE STRATEGIC CAPITAL FUND I, LP, RSCF BLOCKER TRUE HEALTH, LLC, AND RSCF I-A BLOCKER TRUE HEALTH, LLC, Appellants, v. CLG INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL., APPELLEES.

On Appeal from the Business Court of Texas, First Division (1B) Hon. Bill Whitehill, Presiding; Cause No. 25-BC01B- 0006

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF OF APPELLEES

Appellees CLG Investments, LLC, Christopher Grottenthaler, Covert

Investment Operations, LLC, True Health Diagnostic Management, LLC, Richard

Covert, Timothy Tatarowicz, Alba Durata, LLC, Melinda Milburn, Jack Novak,

Dana Hovind, Tom Wippman, Mark Thomas Smith, Alexandra Nettesheim, Kyle

Nettesheim, Robert Osterhoff, RJ Investments, Matt Milburn, Michael Clements,

Michael Osterhoff, Karen Miller, Edward McCann, Daniel Grottenthaler, Anita

Grottenthaler, Christian Richards, Christopher Kling, Kevin Nellis, Carol Nellis,

Bruce Zivian, Ryan Nellis, and Ancelmo E. Lopes (the “Remaining Appellees”),

1 file this unopposed motion for a 31-day extension of time to file their Brief of

Appellees, and respectfully show the Court as follows:

DUE DATE

The current deadline for filing the Brief of Appellees for the Remaining

Appellees is January 9, 2026. No previous extension has been sought by the

Remaining Appellees regarding this brief. The Remaining Appellees seek a 31-

day extension until Monday, February 9, 2026, to file their Brief of Appellees. 1

REASONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Fernando De Leon, LCG Ventures, LLC, LCG Venture II, LCG, and Leon

Capital Partners, LLC (the “LCG Appellees”) previously filed for and received an

extension until February 9, 2026. Counsel for the Remaining Appellees

mistakenly believed the extension applied to all Appellees. Appellants and

Appellees agree that a uniform briefing schedule benefits all parties and would

prefer that all Appellees file a responsive brief on the same date.

Additionally, the Remaining Appellees’ counsel has been involved in other

matters and matters with deadlines quickly approaching. In particular:

• Oral Argument in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on January 8, 2026 in Case Number 25-10572, Ayers v. Neugebauer.

• Responding to a Motion for New Trial on January 4, 2026 in the Cause No. 21-6505-442, Pedestal SVN Investments, LLC v. SVN Med, LLC et al.,

1 The Remaining Appellees seek a 31-day extension because a 30-day extension places the deadline on Sunday, February 8, 2026 2 before the 442nd District Court of Denton County, Texas.

• Preparing for a February 2026 jury trial setting including numerous pretrial filings in Case No. 20-000409-CA, Tower Hill Signature Ins. Co. v. SFR Services, LLC, et al., pending before the 19th Judicial Circuit Court of Martin County, Florida.

• Preparing for a February 2, 2026 jury trial setting in Case No. 23-CF- 000937, State of Florida v. McGraw, pending before the 20th Judicial Circuit Court of Lee County, Florida.

EXTENSION SOUGHT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE

This extension is not sought for the purpose of delay but in the interest of

justice, to allow the Remaining Appellees to fully brief the issues to the Court,

with all parties filing briefs on the same schedule.

APPELLANTS DO NOT OPPOSE THIS MOTION Counsel for Appellants do not oppose this motion for extension of time.

For these reasons, the Remaining Appellees respectfully request that the

Court grant this motion and extend the deadline for filing the Remaining

Appellees’ Brief of Appellees by 31 days, up to and including February 9, 2026.

Dated: January 7, 2026. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Ryan Downton Ryan Downton THE TEXAS TRIAL GROUP Texas Bar No. 24036500 875 Carr 693, Ste. 103 Dorado, PR 00646 Phone: 512-680-7947 Ryan@TheTexasTrialGroup.com *Ryan Downton is licensed in Texas, not

3 Puerto Rico

ATTORNEYS FOR REMAINING APPELLEES

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I certify that on January 6, 2025, counsel for Remaining Appellees conferred with Lane Webster, counsel for Appellants, regarding the extension requested herein. Mr. Webster stated that Appellants do not oppose the relief requested in this motion.

/s/ Ryan Downton Ryan Downton

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on January 7, 2026, a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served via e-filing on all counsel of record.

4 Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.

Ryan Downton on behalf of Ryan Downton Bar No. 24036500 ryan@thetexastrialgroup.com Envelope ID: 109784902 Filing Code Description: Motion Filing Description: Motion for Extension of Time Status as of 1/8/2026 7:05 AM CST

Case Contacts

Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status

LaDawn Nandrasy 4715800 ladawn.nandrasy@wickphillips.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT

Sean Lemoine sean.lemoine@wickphillips.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT

Rashella Widdoes - Paralegal widdoes@RoggeDunnGroup.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT

Colin PBenton colin.benton@wickphillips.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT

Lanette Fidone lanette.fidone@wickphillips.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT

Samantha Tandy samantha.tandy@wickphillips.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT

Zachary Farrar Zachary.Farrar@wickphillips.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT

Harvey Joseph Joseph@roggedunngroup.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT

Karina Enriquez karina.enriquez@wickphillips.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT

Lane Webster webster@RoggeDunnGroup.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT

Rogge Dunn dunn@roggedunngroup.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT

Barb Morgan barb.morgan@wickphillips.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT

Associated Case Party: Riverside Strategic Capital Fund I, L.P., RSCF Blocker True Health, LLC, RSCF I-A Blocker True Health, LLC

Adam Gogolak AMGogolak@wlrk.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT

William Savitt WDSavitt@wlrk.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT

Michael Avi-Yonah MSAviYonah@wlrk.com 1/7/2026 5:06:46 PM SENT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Riverside Stategic Capital Fund I, LP, RSCF Blocker True Health, LLC, RSCF I-A Blocker True Health, LLC v. CLG Investments, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riverside-stategic-capital-fund-i-lp-rscf-blocker-true-health-llc-rscf-texapp-2026.