Riverside Lumber Co. v. Hampton
32 A. 960, 12 Del. 486, 7 Houston 486, 1887 Del. LEXIS 6
Opinion
charged the jury:
That the materials furnished for the fence were not covered by the claim as filed in the case, which was for materials furnished for the three brick houses specified in it, a fence being a structure within the meaning of the statute, but not a brick house or any part of it, unless so stated in the claim.
Verdict for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Riverside Lumber Co. v. Hampton, 32 A. 960, 12 Del. 486, 7 Houston 486, 1887 Del. LEXIS 6 (Del. Ct. App. 1887).
32 A. 960 (Riverside Lumber Co. v. Hampton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jardel Co., Inc. v. Hughes
523 A.2d 518 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1987)
Sheats v. Bowen
318 F. Supp. 640 (D. Delaware, 1970)
Young v. Saroukos
185 A.2d 274 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1962)
Wyatt v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company
154 F. Supp. 143 (D. Delaware, 1957)
Stein v. Diamond State Telephone Co.
146 A. 737 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1929)
Moroder v. Fox
143 N.W. 1040 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1914)