Riverside Iron Works v. Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Riverside Iron Works v. Circuit Judge

1 McGrath 367, 100 McGrath 124

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedApril 17, 1894

DocketNo. 13969

StatusPublished

This text of 1 McGrath 367 (Riverside Iron Works v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Riverside Iron Works v. Circuit Judge, 1 McGrath 367, 100 McGrath 124 (Mich. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

To compel respondent to vacate an order allowing certain creditors, whose debts had not been merged in judgment, to intervene, answer and file a cross-bill resisting the petition of the relator, filed under How. Stat., Sec. 8153, upon the return of an execution unsatisfied, for the sequestration of the stock and property of the corporation and the appointment of a receiver of the same.

Granted April 17, 1894, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To compel respondent to vacate an order allowing certain creditors, whose debts had not been merged in judgment, to intervene, answer and file a cross-bill resisting the petition of the relator, filed under How. Stat., Sec. 8153, upon the return of an execution unsatisfied, for the sequestration of the stock and property of the corporation and the appointment of a receiver of the same.

Granted April 17, 1894, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 McGrath 367, 100 McGrath 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riverside-iron-works-v-circuit-judge-mich-1894.