Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United States

282 U.S. 838, 51 S. Ct. 21, 75 L. Ed. 745, 1930 U.S. LEXIS 126
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 13, 1930·No. No. 100·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Petition for writ [839]*839of certiorari to the Court of Claims denied.

Messrs. J. Marvin Haynes, Robert H. Montgomery, and Thomas G. Haight for petitioner. Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Rugg and Messrs. Claude R. Branch and Charles R. Pollard for the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United States, 282 U.S. 838, 51 S. Ct. 21, 75 L. Ed. 745, 1930 U.S. LEXIS 126 (1930).

282 U.S. 838 (Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related