Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United States

282 U.S. 838, 51 S. Ct. 21, 75 L. Ed. 745, 1930 U.S. LEXIS 126
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 13, 1930
DocketNo. 100
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 282 U.S. 838 (Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United States, 282 U.S. 838, 51 S. Ct. 21, 75 L. Ed. 745, 1930 U.S. LEXIS 126 (1930).

Opinion

Petition for writ [839]*839of certiorari to the Court of Claims denied.

Messrs. J. Marvin Haynes, Robert H. Montgomery, and Thomas G. Haight for petitioner. Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Rugg and Messrs. Claude R. Branch and Charles R. Pollard for the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 U.S. 838, 51 S. Ct. 21, 75 L. Ed. 745, 1930 U.S. LEXIS 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riverside-dan-river-cotton-mills-inc-v-united-states-scotus-1930.