Riverside Borough School District v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 607

389 Pa. 637
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 1, 1957·No. Appeals, Nos. 288, 289, 290·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

These appeals are from a decree granting a preliminary injunction. As there appears to be reasonable grounds for the action of the court below and as the rules of law relied upon by the court are neither palpably wrong nor clearly inapplicable, the decree of the court below must be affirmed: see Lindenfelser v. Lindenfelser, 385 Pa. 342, 123 A. 2d 626; New Kensington v. Municipal Authority of the City of New Kensington, 383 Pa. 182, 118 A. 2d 149; and Cohen v. A. M. Byers Co., 363 Pa. 618, 70 A. 2d 837. We do not reach the merits of the controversy on these appeals.

Decree affirmed at appellant’s costs.

Mr. Justice Musmanno and Mr. Justice Coi-ien dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riverside Borough School District v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 607, 389 Pa. 637 (Pa. 1957).

389 Pa. 637 (Riverside Borough School District v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 607) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stryjewski v. Local Union No. 830
233 A.2d 264 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)
PA. TURNPIKE COMMISSION v. Evans
139 A.2d 530 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1958)
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Evans
139 A.2d 530 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1958)
Motor Transport Labor Relations, Inc. v. Team Drivers Local No. 470
389 Pa. 638 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1957)