Riverside Apartment Corp. v. Capitol Construction Co.
This text of 110 N.J. Eq. 67 (Riverside Apartment Corp. v. Capitol Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported in 107 N. J. Eq. 405.
On appeal of Junction Milling Company — ■
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 15.
For reversal — -None.
On appeal of Mowre Lager and Max Platt — •
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
[68]*68On appeal of West Bergen Trust Company—
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Bodine, Daly, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 12.
For modification — Case, Donges, Dear, JJ. 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 N.J. Eq. 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riverside-apartment-corp-v-capitol-construction-co-nj-1932.