Rivers v. Woodside Nat'l Bank

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Rivers v. Woodside Nat'l Bank

147 S.E. 661, 150 S.C. 45, 1929 S.C. LEXIS 124

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedApril 10, 1929

Docket12640

StatusPublished

This text of 147 S.E. 661 (Rivers v. Woodside Nat'l Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rivers v. Woodside Nat'l Bank, 147 S.E. 661, 150 S.C. 45, 1929 S.C. LEXIS 124 (S.C. 1929).

Pincite

Opinions

April 10, 1929. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This is a cause in equity, and it is incumbent upon the appellant to convince the Court that the Circuit Judge was in error in the conclusions reached by him as to the facts. We have not been so convinced. The cause depends entirely upon the facts, as there is no error of law. The decree of the Circuit Judge, Hon. T.S. Sease, will be reported, and it is affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WATTS and MR. JUSTICE COTHRAN concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

April 10, 1929. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This is a cause in equity, and it is incumbent upon the appellant to convince the Court that the Circuit Judge was in error in the conclusions reached by him as to the facts. We have not been so convinced. The cause depends entirely upon the facts, as there is no error of law. The decree of the Circuit Judge, Hon. T.S. Sease, will be reported, and it is affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WATTS and MR. JUSTICE COTHRAN concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 S.E. 661, 150 S.C. 45, 1929 S.C. LEXIS 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivers-v-woodside-natl-bank-sc-1929.