Rivers v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rivers v. State

224 S.W.3d 639, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 791, 2007 WL 1531289

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 29, 2007·No. ED 88401·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry Rivers appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The judgment is based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2). Further, no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment denying post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry Rivers appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The judgment is based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2). Further, no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment denying post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Rivers v. State, 224 S.W.3d 639, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 791, 2007 WL 1531289 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

224 S.W.3d 639 (Rivers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.