Rivers v. State
This text of 92 S.E. 224 (Rivers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The motion for a new trial having been overruled on January 17, 1917, and the bill of exceptions having been tendered for certification on February 13, 1917, the motion to'dismiss the writ of error must be sustained. Civil Code (1910), § 6153. ■
2. On account of the peculiar facts appearing as to the cause of the delay in tendering the bill of exceptions, this court, before entering the order of dismissal, examined into the merits of the case. No error of law is complained of, and the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 S.E. 224, 19 Ga. App. 743, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivers-v-state-gactapp-1917.