Rivers v. State
This text of 73 S.E. 610 (Rivers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The objections to disconnected excerpts from the charge are ■without merit, when considered with the instructions in their entirety.
2. The law of voluntary manslaughter was applicable to reasonable deductions from the evidence.
3. The written request to charge was substantially covered by the general charge.
4. It was not material error to permit a witness, after describing the location of the fatal wound on the body of the decedent, to state that the location of the wound indicated the position of the decedent when shot.
5. No error of law appears, and there was evidence to support the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 S.E. 610, 10 Ga. App. 487, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivers-v-state-gactapp-1912.