Rivers v. State
This text of 70 S.E. 47 (Rivers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a criminal case, where the accused has exercised his statutory right to make a statement and the statement is contradictory of the testimony of the State’s witness, it is the duty of the trial judge, even in the absence of written request, to instruct the jury that they have the right to believe' the' statement in preference to the sworn testimony. Burns v. State, 89 Ga. 528 (15 S. E. 748); Doster v. State, 93 Ga. 43 (4), (18 S. E. 997); Fields v. State, 2 Ga. App. 41 (4), 46 (58 S. E. 327). Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 S.E. 47, 8 Ga. App. 694, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivers-v-state-gactapp-1911.