Rivers v. Owen

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Rivers v. Owen

316 S.E.2d 579, 170 Ga. App. 166, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1834

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 7, 1984

Docket67866

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 316 S.E.2d 579 (Rivers v. Owen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rivers v. Owen, 316 S.E.2d 579, 170 Ga. App. 166, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1834 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Sognier, Judge.

Otis William Owen sued Cedrick Rivers, d/b/a Ace Automobile Repair Services, to recover the cost of repairs to his automobile. The jury found for Owen and the trial court denied Rivers’ motion for a new tried. Rivers appeals.

Appellant’s argument involves the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. The record contains no transcript or brief of the evidence adduced at trial. In the absence of a transcript we must presume as a matter of law that the evidence at trial was sufficient to support the judgment below. Stefan Jewelers v. Berry, 163 Ga. App. 626 (2) (295 SE2d 373) (1982).

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, C. J., and Deen, P. J., concur. Michael Welch, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI