Rivers v. New York Evening Journal Publishing Co.

104 N.Y.S. 1081
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rivers v. New York Evening Journal Publishing Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 A.D. 574

Opinion

JENKS, J.

We think that this judgment should be affirmed for the reasons stated by the learned justice who presided at the Special Term. We may add as authorities which sustain his conclusion Gidney v. Blake, 11 Johns. 54, Dorland v. Patterson, 23 Wend. 422-424.

The interlocutory judgment must be affirmed, with leave to the defendant to plead over upon payment of costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rivers v. New York Evening Journal Publishing Co., 104 N.Y.S. 1081 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

104 N.Y.S. 1081 (Rivers v. New York Evening Journal Publishing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gidney v. Blake
11 Johns. 54 (New York Supreme Court, 1814)
Dorland v. Patterson
23 Wend. 422 (New York Supreme Court, 1840)