Rivers v. Integon General Insurance
This text of 719 So. 2d 384 (Rivers v. Integon General Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case, petitioner challenges an order from the circuit court, sitting in its appellate capacity, affirming the trial court’s denial of fees for the attorney who testified as an expert witness on the issue of attorney’s fees. We find no departure from the essential requirements of law. The circuit court appro[385]*385priately considered Travieso v. Travieso, 474 So.2d 1184, 1186 (Fla.1985); United States Fidelity and Guar. Co. v. Rosado, 606 So.2d 628 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) and Orlando Regional Medical Ctr., Inc. v. Chmielewski 573 So.2d 876 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
719 So. 2d 384, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13689, 1998 WL 746762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivers-v-integon-general-insurance-fladistctapp-1998.