Rivers v. Hood
65 Ga. 302
Opinion
When a party in a justice court who had exhausted his continuances, moved again to continue on account of the sickness of a material witness, and the presiding justice stated that no subpoena had been asked for to bring in such witness, but that he had been at the store of the justice shortly before court, apparently well, there was no error in refusing a continuance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rivers v. Hood, 65 Ga. 302 (Ga. 1880).
65 Ga. 302 (Rivers v. Hood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.