Rivers v. Bank of America
This text of 473 F. App'x 334 (Rivers v. Bank of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Brenda Denise Rivers appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to defendant on her employment discrimination and defamation claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rivers v. Bank of Am., No. 9:10-cv-01654-SB, 2012 WL 729250 (D.S.C. Mar. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
473 F. App'x 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivers-v-bank-of-america-ca4-2012.