Rivers v. Bank of America

Fourth Circuit

Rivers v. Bank of America

473 F. App'x 334

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 30, 2012·No. No. 12-1366·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Brenda Denise Rivers appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to defendant on her employment discrimination and defamation claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rivers v. Bank of Am., No. 9:10-cv-01654-SB, 2012 WL 729250 (D.S.C. Mar. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Brenda Denise Rivers appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to defendant on her employment discrimination and defamation claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rivers v. Bank of Am., No. 9:10-cv-01654-SB, 2012 WL 729250 (D.S.C. Mar. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Rivers v. Bank of America, 473 F. App'x 334 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

473 F. App'x 334 (Rivers v. Bank of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.