Rivers Body Orlando, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

167 So. 2d 760
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 2, 1964·No. No. 4431·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rivers Body of Orlando, Inc. appeals a final judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict for the defendant, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company.

The issue raised on appeal is the objection of plaintiff to a particular instruction to the jury.

The findings of the jury which have been* reviewed by the trial judge on motion for new trial will not be disturbed on appeal' when there is any substantial evidence to’ support the verdict unless error of the-trial judge in the instructions to the jury will result in a miscarriage of justice. The-record on appeal fails to establish such, fact. Dowling v. Loftin, Fla.1954, 72 So.. 2d 283.

Affirmed.

WHITE, Acting C. J., ANDREWS, J.,. and McCORD, GUYTE P., Jr., Associate: Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rivers Body Orlando, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 167 So. 2d 760 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

167 So. 2d 760 (Rivers Body Orlando, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henningsen v. Smith
174 So. 2d 85 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)