Rivers Body Orlando, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

167 So. 2d 760
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 2, 1964
DocketNo. 4431
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 167 So. 2d 760 (Rivers Body Orlando, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rivers Body Orlando, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 167 So. 2d 760 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rivers Body of Orlando, Inc. appeals a final judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict for the defendant, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company.

The issue raised on appeal is the objection of plaintiff to a particular instruction to the jury.

The findings of the jury which have been* reviewed by the trial judge on motion for new trial will not be disturbed on appeal' when there is any substantial evidence to’ support the verdict unless error of the-trial judge in the instructions to the jury will result in a miscarriage of justice. The-record on appeal fails to establish such, fact. Dowling v. Loftin, Fla.1954, 72 So.. 2d 283.

Affirmed.

WHITE, Acting C. J., ANDREWS, J.,. and McCORD, GUYTE P., Jr., Associate: Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henningsen v. Smith
174 So. 2d 85 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 So. 2d 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivers-body-orlando-inc-v-hartford-accident-indemnity-co-fladistctapp-1964.