Riverhead Savings Bank v. Hill
This text of 262 A.D. 913 (Riverhead Savings Bank v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendants executors and trustees from an order directing that a deficiency judgment be entered against them in a foreclosure action and from the judgment entered pursuant thereto. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Mo opinion. Appeal from judgment dismissed, without costs. Mo judgment is printed in the record on appeal. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 A.D. 913, 29 N.Y.S.2d 726, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riverhead-savings-bank-v-hill-nyappdiv-1941.