Riverhead Food Market, Inc. v. Taddeus Zalewski
This text of 221 A.D.2d 617 (Riverhead Food Market, Inc. v. Taddeus Zalewski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover a down payment, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.), dated August 1, 1994, which denied their motion to vacate a default judgment dated May 25, 1994.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court found that the proffered excuse of law office failure was not a reasonable excuse for the defendants’ default. Under the circumstances of this case we discern no improvident exercise of discretion in the Supreme Court’s rejection of this excuse (see, Fennell v Mason, 204 AD2d 599; Putney v Pearlman, 203 AD2d 333).
The defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Thompson, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
221 A.D.2d 617, 635 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riverhead-food-market-inc-v-taddeus-zalewski-nyappdiv-1995.