Rivercreek Preserve, LLC v. Ameris Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rivercreek Preserve, LLC v. Ameris Bank

141 So. 3d 261, 2014 WL 3057507, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10446

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 8, 2014

DocketNo. 1D14-1568

StatusPublished

This text of 141 So. 3d 261 (Rivercreek Preserve, LLC v. Ameris Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rivercreek Preserve, LLC v. Ameris Bank, 141 So. 3d 261, 2014 WL 3057507, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10446 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellants’ response to the Court’s order of May 6, 2014, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not one which determines jurisdiction of the person. Cf. Keehn v. Joseph C. Mackey and Co., 420 So.2d 398 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Therefore, this Court lacks jurisdiction to review the order by appeal. Moreover, we decline appellants’ suggestion that we undertake cer-[262]*262tiorari review, concluding that appellants have failed to demonstrate entitlement to such relief. Belair v. Drew, 770 So.2d 1164, 1166 (Fla.2000). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

BENTON, CLARK, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellants’ response to the Court’s order of May 6, 2014, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not one which determines jurisdiction of the person. Cf. Keehn v. Joseph C. Mackey and Co., 420 So.2d 398 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Therefore, this Court lacks jurisdiction to review the order by appeal. Moreover, we decline appellants’ suggestion that we undertake cer-[262]*262tiorari review, concluding that appellants have failed to demonstrate entitlement to such relief. Belair v. Drew, 770 So.2d 1164, 1166 (Fla.2000). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

BENTON, CLARK, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 So. 3d 261, 2014 WL 3057507, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivercreek-preserve-llc-v-ameris-bank-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack