Rivercreek Preserve, LLC v. Ameris Bank

141 So. 3d 261, 2014 WL 3057507, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10446
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 8, 2014·No. No. 1D14-1568·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellants’ response to the Court’s order of May 6, 2014, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not one which determines jurisdiction of the person. Cf. Keehn v. Joseph C. Mackey and Co., 420 So.2d 398 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Therefore, this Court lacks jurisdiction to review the order by appeal. Moreover, we decline appellants’ suggestion that we undertake cer-[262] tiorari review, concluding that appellants have failed to demonstrate entitlement to such relief. Belair v. Drew, 770 So.2d 1164, 1166 (Fla.2000). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

BENTON, CLARK, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rivercreek Preserve, LLC v. Ameris Bank, 141 So. 3d 261, 2014 WL 3057507, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10446 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

141 So. 3d 261 (Rivercreek Preserve, LLC v. Ameris Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Keehn v. Joseph C. MacKey and Co.
420 So. 2d 398 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Belair v. Drew
770 So. 2d 1164 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)