Rivera v. United States Sentencing Commission

321 F. App'x 3
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided March 25, 2009·No. No. 08-5361·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed July 25, 2008, 2008 WL 2874192, be affirmed. Appellant did not show a “clear and indisputable right” to mandamus relief. See Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271, 289, 108 S.Ct. 1133, 99 L.Ed.2d 296 (1988).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rivera v. United States Sentencing Commission, 321 F. App'x 3 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

321 F. App'x 3 (Rivera v. United States Sentencing Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.
485 U.S. 271 (Supreme Court, 1988)