Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Rivera v. Time Warner Cable

Rivera v. Time Warner Cable

228 A.D.2d 661, 644 N.Y.2d 969, 644 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7403
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 24, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 228 A.D.2d 661 (Rivera v. Time Warner Cable) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rivera v. Time Warner Cable, 228 A.D.2d 661, 644 N.Y.2d 969, 644 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7403 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

We find unpersuasive the appellant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by the trial court’s conduct. The trial court’s interjections, albeit frequent, were designed to, and did, elicit and clarify facts material to the issues in the trial and expedite the progress of the trial (LaMotta v City of New York, 130 AD2d 627), and were performed in an "evenhanded, nonprejudicial” manner (Vialva v City of New York, 118 AD2d 701, 704). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lopez v. Sheskier
262 A.D.2d 536 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D.2d 661, 644 N.Y.2d 969, 644 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivera-v-time-warner-cable-nyappdiv-1996.