Rivera v. Time Warner Cable
228 A.D.2d 661, 644 N.Y.2d 969, 644 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7403
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 24, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We find unpersuasive the appellant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by the trial court’s conduct. The trial court’s interjections, albeit frequent, were designed to, and did, elicit and clarify facts material to the issues in the trial and expedite the progress of the trial (LaMotta v City of New York, 130 AD2d 627), and were performed in an "evenhanded, nonprejudicial” manner (Vialva v City of New York, 118 AD2d 701, 704). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rivera v. Time Warner Cable, 228 A.D.2d 661, 644 N.Y.2d 969, 644 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7403 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
228 A.D.2d 661 (Rivera v. Time Warner Cable) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lopez v. Sheskier
262 A.D.2d 536 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)