Rivera v. Stirling

Fourth Circuit

Rivera v. Stirling

671 F. App'x 57

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 28, 2016·No. No. 16-6903·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Syncere Rivera appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rivera v. Stirling, No. 8:15-cv-03650-JMC, 2016 WL 3406234 (D.S.C. June 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [58] the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Syncere Rivera appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rivera v. Stirling, No. 8:15-cv-03650-JMC, 2016 WL 3406234 (D.S.C. June 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [58] the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Rivera v. Stirling, 671 F. App'x 57 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

671 F. App'x 57 (Rivera v. Stirling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related