Rivera v. State

898 So. 2d 1208, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5068, 2005 WL 840478
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 13, 2005·No. No. 4D04-2347·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation. The State concedes that the sentencing order contains an apparent scrivener’s error since the trial court credited the appellant with all time previously served in prison on the original split-sentence for counts I-IV, but unlike the prison credit blocks on the sentencing order for counts I — III, the prison credit block for count IV was not checked.1 We therefore remand to the trial court to correct this error.

Affirmed and remanded for correction of the sentencing order.

FARMER, C.J., STONE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rivera v. State, 898 So. 2d 1208, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5068, 2005 WL 840478 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

898 So. 2d 1208 (Rivera v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tianvan v. Avco Corp.
898 So. 2d 1208 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)