Rivera v. State
878 So. 2d 502, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11449, 2004 WL 1737301
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rivera v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 840 So. 2d 284 →
Opinion
Because appellant’s time spent at a residential drug treatment program is not equivalent to incarceration, the trial court properly denied his motion for additional credit for time served. See Pennington v. State, 398 So.2d 815 (Fla.1981). See also Toney v. State, 817 So.2d 924 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Taylor v. State, 726 So.2d 348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) Self v. State, 504 So.2d 810 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rivera v. State, 878 So. 2d 502, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11449, 2004 WL 1737301 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
878 So. 2d 502 (Rivera v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pennington v. State
398 So. 2d 815 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Taylor v. State
726 So. 2d 348 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Toney v. State
817 So. 2d 924 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Self v. State
504 So. 2d 810 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)