Rivera v. Selsky

272 A.D.2d 708, 708 N.Y.S.2d 646, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5506
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 11, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 272 A.D.2d 708 (Rivera v. Selsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rivera v. Selsky, 272 A.D.2d 708, 708 N.Y.S.2d 646, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5506 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Following a tier III rehearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of assault and violent conduct. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the misbehavior report, together with the information supplied by a confidential informant and the testimony from the correction officer who authored the misbehavior report, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of petitioner’s guilt (see, Matter of Knight v Goord, 267 AD2d 523, lv denied 94 NY2d 760). We note that our in camera review of the transcript of the confidential testimony confirms that the Hearing Officer properly found it to be reliable and credible (see, id.; Matter of Rosario v Goord, 255 AD2d 851). There is no support in the record for petitioner’s remaining claims of procedural violations and Hearing Officer bias.

Mercure, J. P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hernandez v. Goord
295 A.D.2d 737 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Soto v. Goord
275 A.D.2d 872 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Alford v. Selsky
274 A.D.2d 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Thomas v. Selsky
274 A.D.2d 721 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Martinez v. Selsky
274 A.D.2d 726 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 A.D.2d 708, 708 N.Y.S.2d 646, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivera-v-selsky-nyappdiv-2000.