Rivera v. Rumax Reality Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rivera v. Rumax Reality Corp.

256 A.D. 277, 9 N.Y.S.2d 880

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 17, 1939

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 256 A.D. 277 (Rivera v. Rumax Reality Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rivera v. Rumax Reality Corp., 256 A.D. 277, 9 N.Y.S.2d 880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon the newly-discovered evidence of the president and bookkeeper of the plaintiff’s employer that the plaintiff was at work at the time of the alleged accident and for a considerable time thereafter, the motion for a new trial should have been granted.

[278]*278The determination of the Appellate Term and the judgment and order of the Municipal Court should be reversed and the motion for a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant in all courts to abide the event.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, TJntermyer and Cohn, JJ.

Determination of the Appellate Term and judgment and order of the Municipal Court unanimously reversed, and the motion for a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant in all courts to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI