Rivera v. Rivera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rivera v. Rivera

255 A.D.2d 517, 680 N.Y.S.2d 161, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12644

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 23, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D.2d 517 (Rivera v. Rivera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rivera v. Rivera, 255 A.D.2d 517, 680 N.Y.S.2d 161, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, Eladio Rivera appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, entered November 6, 1997, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Watson, H.E.), entered June 23, 1997, which directed him to pay child support arrears in the principal sum of $15,660.

Ordered that the order entered November 6, 1997, is reversed, on the law, with costs, the objections are sustained, the order entered June 23, 1997, is vacated, and the petition is dismissed.

A review of the record demonstrates that the presently-asserted claim for child support arrears is time-barred (see, CPLR 213 [1]; Tauber v Lebow, 65 NY2d 596, 598; Zaid v Zaid, 238 AD2d 581; Miller v Miller, 156 AD2d 164; cf., Dox v Tynon, 90 NY2d 166). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, Eladio Rivera appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, entered November 6, 1997, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Watson, H.E.), entered June 23, 1997, which directed him to pay child support arrears in the principal sum of $15,660.

Ordered that the order entered November 6, 1997, is reversed, on the law, with costs, the objections are sustained, the order entered June 23, 1997, is vacated, and the petition is dismissed.

A review of the record demonstrates that the presently-asserted claim for child support arrears is time-barred (see, CPLR 213 [1]; Tauber v Lebow, 65 NY2d 596, 598; Zaid v Zaid, 238 AD2d 581; Miller v Miller, 156 AD2d 164; cf., Dox v Tynon, 90 NY2d 166). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D.2d 517, 680 N.Y.S.2d 161, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivera-v-rivera-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack