Rivera v. Persicano
This text of 434 So. 2d 22 (Rivera v. Persicano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A complaint seeking $1,500 in compensatory damages for breach of contract and total damages in excess of $5,000, including punitive damages based on fraudulent inducement as against the corporation and its agent, stated a cause of action within the jurisdictional amount of the circuit court and should not have been dismissed. See Associated Heavy Equipment Schools, Inc. v. Masiello, 219 So.2d 465 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969) (where a breach of contract is attended by a fraud which amounts to an independent tort, and circumstances constituting fraud are alleged, punitive damages may be recovered).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
434 So. 2d 22, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivera-v-persicano-fladistctapp-1983.