Rivera v. Mantello

228 A.D.2d 721, 643 N.Y.2d 428, 643 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6448
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 6, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

As a result of his refusal to cooperate with correction officers during a pat frisk, petitioner was found guilty of refusing a direct order and attempted assault on staff. He argues that this determination is not supported by substantial evidence [722] and that the Hearing Officer presiding at the disciplinary hearing was not impartial. Upon reviewing the record, we find that the misbehavior report, combined with the testimony of the correction officers who witnessed the incident, provide substantial evidence supporting the administrative determination. Moreover, petitioner’s version of his encounter with the correction officers merely presented a credibility question for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Islar v Coombe, 226 AD2d 851). We further find that the Hearing Officer conducted the hearing in a fair and impartial manner. Therefore, we find no reason to disturb the administrative determination.

Mikoll, J. P., White, Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rivera v. Mantello, 228 A.D.2d 721, 643 N.Y.2d 428, 643 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6448 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

228 A.D.2d 721 (Rivera v. Mantello) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Torres v. Goord
275 A.D.2d 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Villanueva v. Coombe
237 A.D.2d 818 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)