Rivera v. Hellman

New York Court of Appeals

Rivera v. Hellman

227 N.E.2d 881, 19 N.Y.2d 885, 281 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1531

DecidedMay 16, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 227 N.E.2d 881 (Rivera v. Hellman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rivera v. Hellman, 227 N.E.2d 881, 19 N.Y.2d 885, 281 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1531 (N.Y. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Roosevelt Hospital. We hold that the lien of Roosevelt Hospital is prior to that of Millinery Workers Health Fund for the reasons stated at Special Term and, in this view of the case, do not reach the question of the amount of the lien of Millinery Workers Health Fund.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Roosevelt Hospital. We hold that the lien of Roosevelt Hospital is prior to that of Millinery Workers Health Fund for the reasons stated at Special Term and, in this view of the case, do not reach the question of the amount of the lien of Millinery Workers Health Fund.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 N.E.2d 881, 19 N.Y.2d 885, 281 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivera-v-hellman-ny-1967.