Rivera v. Hancock

286 P.2d 199, 79 Ariz. 199, 1955 Ariz. LEXIS 150
Arizona Supreme Court·Decided June 28, 1955·No. 5778·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

UDALL, Justice.

The plaintiffs, George Rivera and Mary Rivera, his wife, brought this action against defendants E. V. Hancock and Jean Hancock, his wife, to recover damages in the aggregate sum of $55,000 for personal injuries they allegedly sustained in a collision with defendants’ car. The case was tried to the court, sitting with a jury. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendants and judgment was entered thereon; motion for new trial was made and denied and this appeal followed. Plaintiffs appear here as appellants, the defendants as ap-pellees, but they will be referred to as plaintiffs and defendants.

The scene of this unique accident is difficult to describe in words and may best be visualized by a diagram thereof which we have had prepared from exhibits in evidence:

*201

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rivera v. Hancock, 286 P.2d 199, 79 Ariz. 199, 1955 Ariz. LEXIS 150 (Ark. 1955).

286 P.2d 199 (Rivera v. Hancock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vanoss v. BHP Copper Inc.
418 P.3d 457 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2018)
Townsend v. Whatton
521 P.2d 1014 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1974)
Brooker v. Canny
446 P.2d 929 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1968)
Brooker v. Canny
439 P.2d 309 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1968)
Doubek v. Greco
436 P.2d 494 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1968)
Finn v. J. H. Rose Truck Lines
398 P.2d 935 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1965)
American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Wusich
375 P.2d 364 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1962)
Goodman v. Carson
325 P.2d 819 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1958)