Rivera v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rivera v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

97 So. 3d 989, 2012 WL 4449139, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16169

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 27, 2012

DocketNo. 4D11-4219

StatusPublished

This text of 97 So. 3d 989 (Rivera v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rivera v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., 97 So. 3d 989, 2012 WL 4449139, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16169 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Diana Carla Rivera appeals from an order denying her emergency motion to vacate foreclosure sale, set aside default, and vacate final judgment. Appellee Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee, concedes that the trial court erred in not vacating the final judgment entered against Ms. Rivera, solely on the ground that service of process was not properly effected. Accordingly, appellee requests this Court to reverse and remand so that service may be properly effected on Ms. Rivera. We accept the appellee’s concession of error, and reverse and remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Reversed and remanded.

MAY, C.J., TAYLOR and LEVINE, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Diana Carla Rivera appeals from an order denying her emergency motion to vacate foreclosure sale, set aside default, and vacate final judgment. Appellee Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee, concedes that the trial court erred in not vacating the final judgment entered against Ms. Rivera, solely on the ground that service of process was not properly effected. Accordingly, appellee requests this Court to reverse and remand so that service may be properly effected on Ms. Rivera. We accept the appellee’s concession of error, and reverse and remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Reversed and remanded.

MAY, C.J., TAYLOR and LEVINE, JJ, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 So. 3d 989, 2012 WL 4449139, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivera-v-deutsche-bank-national-trust-co-fladistctapp-2012.